Identifying pesticides of high concern for ecosystem, plant, animal, and human health: A comprehensive field study across Europe and Argentina

Investor logo

Warning

This publication doesn't include Institute of Computer Science. It includes Faculty of Science. Official publication website can be found on muni.cz.
Authors

ALAOUI Abdallah CHRIST Florian SILVA Vera VESTED Anne SCHLUNSSEN Vivi GONZALEZ Neus GAI Lingtong ABRANTES Nelson BALDI Isabelle BUREAU Mathilde HARKES Paula NORGAARD Trine NAVARRO Irene ADRIAN de la Torre SANZ Paloma MARTINEZ Maria Angeles HOFMAN Jakub PASKOVIC Igor PASKOVIC Marija Polic GLAVAN Matjaz LWANGA Esperanza Huerta APARICIO Virginia Carolina CAMPOS Isabel ALCON Francisco CONTRERAS Josefa MANDRIOLI Daniele SGARGI Daria SCHEEPERS Paul T. J. RITSEMA Coen GEISSEN Violette

Year of publication 2024
Type Article in Periodical
Magazine / Source Science of the Total Environment
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Science

Citation
Web https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969724048204?via%3Dihub
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174671
Keywords SPRINT project; Mixture of pesticide residues; Detection frequency; Median concentration; Hazard
Attached files
Description The widespread and excessive use of pesticides in modern agricultural practices has caused pesticide contamination of the environment, animals, and humans, with confirmed serious health consequences. This study aimed to identify the 20 most critical substances based on an analysis of detection frequency (DF) and median concentrations (MC) across environmental and biological matrices. A sampling campaign was conducted across 10 case study sites in Europe and 1 in Argentina, each encompassing conventional and organic farming systems. We analysed 209 active substances in a total of 4609 samples. All substances ranked among the 20 most critical were detected in silicon wristbands worn by humans and animals and indoor dust from both farming systems. Five of them were detected in all environmental matrices. Overall, higher values of DF and MC, including in the blood plasma of animals and humans, were recorded in samples of conventional compared to organic farms. The differences between farming systems were greater in the environmental samples and less in animal and human samples. Ten substances were detected in animal blood plasma from conventional farms and eight in animal blood plasma from organic farms. Two of those, detected in both farming systems, are classified as hazardous for mammals (acute). Five substances detected in animal blood plasma from organic farms and seven detected in animal blood plasma from conventional farms are classified as hazardous for mammals (dietary). Three substances detected in human blood plasma are classified as carcinogens. Seven of the substances detected in human blood plasma are classified as endocrine disruptors. Six substances, of which five were detected in human blood plasma, are hazardous for reproduction/development. Efforts are needed to elucidate the unknown effects of mixtures, and it is crucial that such research also considers biocides and banned substances, which constitute a baseline of contamination that adds to the effect of substances used in agriculture.
Related projects:

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.

More info