Tellurium complexes with new, large-bite dithio ligands. The crystal structures of cis- and trans- [Te{Ph2P(S)-N-P(S)(OPh)(2)}(2)] and [(4-MeOC6H4TeCl3)(2){mu-(Pr2P)-Pr-i(S)-Fc-P(S)Pr-i(2)}]

Investor logo

Warning

This publication doesn't include Institute of Computer Science. It includes Faculty of Science. Official publication website can be found on muni.cz.
Authors

NEČAS Marek NOVOSAD Josef HUSEBYE Steinar

Year of publication 2001
Type Article in Periodical
Magazine / Source Journal of Organometallic Chemistry
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Science

Citation
Field Inorganic chemistry
Keywords tellurium(II) and (IV) complexes; new dithio ligands; crystal structures
Description Reaction of the protonated large-bite bidentate ligand Ph2P(S)-NH-P(S)(OPh)(2) with [Te{NH2)(2)CS}(4)]Cl-2 resulted in the complex [Te(L-L)(2)] (1a), where (L-L)(-) = Ph2P(S)-N-P(S)(OPh)(2). When (L-L)(-) reacted with 4-MeOC6H4TeCl3, an isomeric complex, 1b. resulted. Reaction between the less basic ligand 'Pr2P(S)-Fc-P(S)'Pr-2 (Fc = ferrocene) and 4-MeOC6H4TeCl3 yielded the complex [(4-MeOC6H4TeCl3)(2) {mu-'Pr2P(S)-Fc-P(S)'Pr-2}], (2). X-ray crystallographic studies show that 1a and 1b both are square planar complexes of Te(II), 1a being asymmetric and 'cis' with two short Te-S bonds trans to two long Te-S bonds (average bond lengths being 2.5415 and 2.9050 Angstrom). Isomer Ib is centrosymmetric, 'trans', with nearly equal Te-S bond lengths averaging 2.6805 Angstrom. Complex 2 is an addition compound where the large dithio ligand bridges two 4-MeOC6H4TeCl3 units through weak Te-S bonds. The resulting coordination around each Te(IV) atom is psi -octahedral with the lone pair of electrons and aryl in axial positions relative to the TeCl3S equatorial plane. Here the Te-S bond lengths are 2.7560(16) and 2.6910(12) Angstrom. The trans influence of the dithio ligand in 2 is smaller than that of Cl-, resulting in an average Te-Cl bond length trans to sulfur of only 2.4196 Angstrom, while the other Te-Cl bond lengths average 2.4959 Angstrom. The reason for the lower basic nature of the ligand with a P-Fc-P backbone compared to those with PN-P backbones, is that it lacks a central charge donating group like N-.
Related projects:

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.

More info