Lower Bounds on the Complexity of MSO_1 Model-Checking

Investor logo

Warning

This publication doesn't include Institute of Computer Science. It includes Faculty of Informatics. Official publication website can be found on muni.cz.
Authors

GANIAN Robert HLINĚNÝ Petr OBDRŽÁLEK Jan LANGER Alexander ROSSMANITH Peter SIKDAR Somnath

Year of publication 2012
Type Article in Proceedings
Conference 29th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science STACS2012
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Informatics

Citation
Web STACS2012
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2012.326
Field Informatics
Keywords Monadic Second-Order Logic; Treewidth; Lower Bounds; Exponential Time Hypothesis; Parameterized Complexity
Description One of the most important algorithmic meta-theorems is a famous result by Courcelle, which states that any graph problem definable in monadic second-order logic with edge-set quantifications (MSO2) is decidable in linear time on any class of graphs of bounded tree-width. In the parlance of parameterized complexity, this means that MSO2 model-checking is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to the tree-width as parameter. Recently, Kreutzer and Tazari proved a corresponding complexity lower-bound---that MSO2 model-checking is not even in XP wrt the formula size as parameter for graph classes that are subgraph-closed and whose tree-width is poly-logarithmically unbounded. Of course, this is not an unconditional result but holds modulo a certain complexity-theoretic assumption, namely, the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH). In this paper we present a closely related result. We show that even MSO1 model-checking with a fixed set of vertex labels, but without edge-set quantifications, is not in XP wrt the formula size as parameter for graph classes which are subgraph-closed and whose tree-width is poly-logarithmically unbounded unless the non-uniform ETH fails. In comparison to Kreutzer and Tazari, (1) we use a stronger prerequisite, namely non-uniform instead of uniform ETH, to avoid the effectiveness assumption and the construction of certain obstructions used in their proofs; and (2) we assume a different set of problems to be efficiently decidable, namely MSO1-definable properties on vertex labeled graphs instead of MSO2-definable properties on unlabeled graphs. Our result has an interesting consequence in the realm of digraph width measures: Strengthening a recent result, we show that no subdigraph-monotone measure can be algorithmically useful, unless it is within a poly-logarithmic factor of (undirected) tree-width.
Related projects:

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.

More info